The High Court at Cuttack disposed of Writ Petition No.17683 of 2021 as the matter does not survive a common judgment rendered in a batch proceeding (O.A.T. Bar Association case).
The writ petition is disposed of as it does not survive the common judgment in the batch.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No.17683 of 2021
Susma Sushila Kullu
…. Petitioner
Mr. Saroj Kumar Padhi, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. A. P. Das, ASC for State
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
31.01.2022
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
Judge
SK Guin/S. Behera
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersRelied on¶15
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Susma Sushila Kullu
State of Odisha
Dr. S. Muralidhar
Justice R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
