The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition, held the petitioner entitled to pensionary benefits equivalent to Sarat Chandra Parida judgment, and directed opposite parties to extend benefits within four months.
Opposite parties directed to extend pensionary and other retiral benefits to the petitioner within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 17178 of 2022
Bipina Bihari Rout
.....
Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Rath, Advocate
- Versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…..
Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
16.11.2022
Order No.
02
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to sanction and release of pension and pensionary benefits by construing judgment in Sarat Chandra Parida
Whether petitioner standing on same footing as in W.P. (C) No.22316 of 2018 warrants similar disposal
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of OdishaApplied¶3
Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of Odisha, 2015 (II) ILR-CUT 94 · Who else cites this
W.P. (C) No.22316 of 2018Referred¶4
W.P. (C) No.22316 of 2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bipina Bihari Rout
State of Odisha
B. R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
