Disposed
Laxman Ch.Mahanta v. State and Ors.
Orissa HCWP(C)/1704/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous due to efflux of time without further direction.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 1704 OF 2013
¶2
Laxman Ch. Mahanta
¶3
……… Petitioner Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal, Adv.
¶4
-versus-
¶5
State of Orissa & Ors. ...……… Opposite Parties Mr. K.K.Gaya, ASC
¶6
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
¶7
ORDER 22.03.2022
¶8
Order No. 04.
¶9
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard Mr. S.N.Biswal, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. S.P.Sarangi, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.5 and Mr. K.K.Gaya, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.
¶10
- On the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.5 and referring to the counter affidavit, it reveals that with the efflux of time the matter has become infructuous.
¶11
- Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of being infructuous.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Laxman Ch. Mahanta
- respondent
State of Orissa & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
V. Narasimha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court