The petitioner sought regularization of service in a Group-D post. The court permitted a representation to the respondent and directed consideration within three months before disposing the writ petition.
Petitioner permitted to make a representation. Respondent directed to consider grievances and complete exercise within three months; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.16968 of 2022
Prasanna Kumar Sahu
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
22.07.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for both the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
“(i). Directing the O.P. No.1 and 2 to take a decision within short stipulated time regarding regularization of service of the Petitioner in Group-D post under C.D.V.O., Sambalpur (O.P. No.4)”.
4. Taking into account the nature of claim made in the Writ Petition and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Petitioner is permitted to make a representation before Opp. Party No.1 within a period of 15(fifteen) days from today.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed by the Petitioner ventilating his grievances, the same shall be considered by Opp. party No. 1 in accordance with law and also
// 2 //
taking into account the order passed under Anenxure-6. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 3(Three) months from the date of receipt of such representation.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization of service in a Group-D post.
Whether the court can direct the respondent to take a decision on the matter.
Prasanna Kumar Sahu
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
