Disposed

Hrushikesh Mishra v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC12 Sept 2022WP(C)/16366/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner approached Court claiming full salary and benefits. Court avoided merits and disposed of petition by directing opposite party No.1 to consider his representations and pass order within four weeks after giving hearing opportunity.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with direction to opposite party No.1 to consider petitioner's representations and pass an order within four weeks after granting opportunity of hearing.

Hrushikesh Mishra Vs State of Odisha — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No. 16366 of 2022

¶3

Hrushikesh Mishra .… Petitioner

¶4

Dr. B.K. Mishra, Advocate

¶5

Versus -

¶6

State of Odisha & Ors.

¶7

.… Opp.Parties

¶8

Mr. Saswat Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

ORDER

12.09.2022

Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl.

¶17

Government Advocate for the State.

¶18

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the

¶19

following relief.

¶20

“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court would graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition, call for the records and issue a writ in the nature of mandamus;

¶21

i) Directing the Opposite Parties to continue to extend full salary cost to the petitioner as part of Grant-inAid from the date of his joining, i.e. 16/10/1992;

¶22

ii) Directing the opposite parties to extend all the consequential service benefits;

¶23

And pass any other appropriate order/orders, writ/writs, direction/directions as this Hon’ble court may deem just and proper in the interest of justice,

¶24

And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

¶25

In course of hearing it is submitted that ventilating the same grievance, the petitioner has approached the Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Odisha by submitting a representation on 16.10.2019 followed by another representation on 24.02.2021 as also a representation to the Director, Higher Education Department on 24.02.2021.

¶26

Page 1 of 2

¶27

Since a decision is to be taken on the grievance of the petitioner by the authority at first instance, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.1 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and to pass an order in accordance with law after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order or on production of certified copy by the petitioner.

¶28

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶29

( Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge

¶30

A.K. Rana

¶31

Page 2 of 2

Hrushikesh Mishra v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hrushikesh Mishra v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amiya Ranjan Sahoo @ Amiya Kumar Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Prasanna Bhoi Vs State of Odisha

Abhinash @ Abinash Behera Vs State of Odisha

Chandrakanti Suna Vs State of Odisha

Soumya Dixit Vs Secy.Cbse,New Delhi

Sonali Behera Vs State of Odisha