The High Court of Orissa dismissed a Public Interest Litigation writ petition on 03.01.2022 by a one-paragraph order stating it was dismissed for non-prosecution when counsel for the petitioner had no instructions.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) (PIL)No.16366 of 2015
Ramakanta Behera and others
…. Petitioners Mr.A.K. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr.A.P.DAs, ASC for State
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No. 14.03.2022
03. 1. The matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual
/physical mode).
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no
instructions.
3. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
U. Sahoo/J. Behera
Ramakanta Behera and others
State of Odisha and others
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
