The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed in 2022 challenging an order from 2019. The court held that the petition suffered from delay and laches, citing a previous order dismissing a similar matter, and refused to entertain the petition at this belated stage.
The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No.16119 of 2022
Sarbeswar Behera and others
….. Petitioners Mr. R. Acharya, Advocate
Vs.
Union of India and others ….. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER 19.09.2022
02
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok/Subhasmita
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition merits consideration given the delay and laches of three years.
Whether the Writ Petition can be entertained after dismissal of a similar matter in State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasReferred¶3
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021 dismissed on 16.07.2021)
Sarbeswar Behera and others
Union of India and others
B.R. Sarangi
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
