This court dismissed a pre-arrest bail application, withholding relief on account of the nature of allegations and gravity of offence. The order conditions non-arrest upon surrender within three weeks to the lower court, contingent on verification of antecedent records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.16048 of 2022
Mitu Badajena @ Nrusingh Charan …. Petitioner Badajena
Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opp. Party Mr. S. Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
22.12.2022
// 2 //
cash security of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) before the Court in seisin over the matter and shall not indulge in similar criminal activities while on bail. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail of the Petitioner automatically.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
Debasis
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted for alleged commission of offences under Sections 379/411/34 of the I.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mitu Badajena @ Nrusingh Charan
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
