Disposed

Rakesh Kumar Senapati v. R.T.O.,Bbsr

Orissa HC27 Jun 2022WP(C)/15645/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner sought exemption from penalties for non-payment of arrear vehicle tax. The Single Judge granted liberty to pay the tax within four weeks and sought an undertaking to appeal against penalty imposition before accepting the payment.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to pay arrear tax within four weeks; authority directed to accept payment and consider permit upon undertaking to appeal against penalties.

Rakesh Kumar Senapati Vs R.T.O.,Bbsr — Orissa HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No. 15645 OF 2022

¶3

Rakesh Kumar Senapati …. Petitioner

¶4

Mr. Chandan Mishra, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

R.T.O., Bhubaneswar and another

¶7

…. Opp. Parties Mr. Pravakar Behera,

¶8

Standing Counsel, Transport Department

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

¶11

Order No.

¶12

¶13

ORDER 27.06.2022 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. The Petitioner in this writ petition prays for a direction for acceptance of arrear tax amount by exempting penalties due to non-payment of tax of the vehicle bearing Registration No.OD-02-BG-7614 (Tipper) for the period from 01.04.2020 to 30.06.2022 within the stipulated period.

¶14

Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner may be permitted to pay the arrear tax and move the appellate authority challenging imposition of penalties. He further submits that due to some inadvertency, the Petitioner could not pay the tax in time in respect of the aforesaid vehicle for which the authorities have imposed penalties. He, therefore, prays for a direction for waiver of the penalties and acceptance of the arrear tax in question.

¶15

Mr. Behera, learned Standing Counsel for the Transport Department submits that similar writ petitions have been disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioner to pay the arrear tax

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

and file an appeal before the appellate authority assailing imposition of penalties.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event the Petitioner pays the arrear tax in respect of the vehicle bearing registration No. OD-02-BG-7614 (Tipper) within a period of four weeks and gives an undertaking to the effect that he will file an appeal before the appellate authority for waiver of the penalties, the appropriate authority shall accept the same and proceed in accordance with law. On payment of outstanding tax amount and upon filing of an application, if any, the authority shall consider issuance of permit and fitness certificate in respect of the aforesaid vehicle in accordance with law.

¶20

Issue urgent certified copy of the Order on proper application. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge

¶21

s.s.satapathy

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Rakesh Kumar Senapati v. R.T.O.,Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar Senapati v. R.T.O.,Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendranath Mahanta Vs Seema Murmu, O.C.S. II

Saroj Kumar Mahanta Vs Seema Murmu, O.C.S. II

M/S.Kalinga Trade and Travels, Cuttack Vs the Transport Commnr.-Cum-Chairman, Sta, Cuttack

M/S Kiran Projects (P) Ltd., Cuttack Vs R.T.O.,Cuttack

Babula Patra Vs R.T.O.,Cuttack

Ramesh Behera Vs R.T.O.,Sambalpur