The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition filed by the State. The Court held that the petition suffered from delay and laches as over two years had passed since the impugned order of 2019, applying a specific precedent.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as it suffers from delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P (C) No. 15608 of 2021
State of Odisha and others
….. Petitioners
Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA
Vs.
Subhasini Lamga and others
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
17.08.2022
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok/Kishore
(G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed with a delay of more than two years between the impugned order and the filing of the petition can be entertained.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasApplied¶17
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021 dismissed on 16.07.2021)
State of Odisha and others
Subhasini Lamga and others
B.R. Sarangi
G. Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
