This court disposed of a writ petition and interim application where it was contended that the disputed amount had already been disbursed in favor of the petitioners. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Disposal of the writ petition and interim application without substantive determination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.15129 of 2014 I.A. ……… of 2023
Madan Nayak & Ors.
…. Petitioners
-versus-
Divisional Railway & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
06.01.2023
Order No
15. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. I.A. filed in Court today be registered.
3. Heard Ms. Nayak on behalf of Mr. Bimbisar Dash, learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties and Mr. K.K. Jena, learned counsel for the Petitioners.
4. It is contended that the amount in question has already been disbursed in favour of the Petitioners herein on 08.09.2022 vide Annexure-C/1.
5. In view of the same, nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition and accordingly the writ petition as well as I.A. are disposed of.
Sneha
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Madan Nayak & Ors.
Divisional Railway & Ors.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
