Pranabandhu Biswal v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.15112 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Pranabandhu Biswal …. Petitioner
Mr. Bijay Kumar Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S. N. Das, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
29.06.2022
Order No.
01. 1. Mr. Nayak, learned advocate, appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client’s wife died in motor accident. His client claimed compensation by representation dated 1st November, 2019 addressed to opposite party no.3. Said opposite party is required to forward the representation to opposite party no.2 for consideration and disposal. He submits, the representation has not been forwarded. He prays for appropriate directions.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
serve this order and copy of the representation to opposite party no.3. The result of consideration of the representation by opposite party no.2 must made known to petitioner within three weeks of communication.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Prasant
Page 2 of 2
Pranabandhu Biswal
State of Odisha
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court