The High Court dismissed the writ petition in a Cooperative Society election dispute, holding that the remedy lies in a proper election dispute. The court declined jurisdiction after the notification for ensuing elections was published.
Court was not inclined to entertain the writ petition and advised filing an election dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14910 OF 2022
Dayanidhi Sa and another Petitioners
Mr. Bhakta Ranjan Barik, Advocate
-versus-
…. Collector, Sundargarh and others Opp. Parties
Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
20.06.2022
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should entertain a writ petition instead of referring the grievance to an election dispute in a Cooperative Society matter.
Whether the notification for ensuing election of the Cooperative Society precludes entertaining this writ petition.
Dayanidhi Sa
Collector, Sundargarh
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
