Disposed

Malati Sethi v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC10 Jun 2022WP(C)/14616/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition for direction for early disposal of an application filed under Section 22 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act. The court directed the SubCollector to take a decision in the pending miscellaneous case upon production of the certified copy of this order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the SubCollector to decide the pending miscellaneous case after production of the certified copy of this order.

Malati Sethi Vs State of Odisha — Land Acquisition | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P. (C) No. 14616 OF 2022

¶3

Malati Sethi and another Petitioners

¶4

Mr. Ghanashyam Muduli, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha and others

¶7

…. Opp. Parties

¶8

Mr. Gyanaranjan Mohapatra, Additional Standing Counsel

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

10.06.2022

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶16

The Petitioners in this writ petition pray for a direction for early disposal of OLR Misc. Case No. 18 of 2020 filed by them under Section 22 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960.

¶17

It is submitted by Mr. Muduli, learned counsel for the Petitioners that in order to meet their legal necessity, the Petitioners filed an application under Section 22 of the O.L.R. Act, which was registered as OLR Misc Case No. 18 of 2020. It is his submission that till date, no action has been taken by the SubCollector, Sadar, Cuttack on the said application for which the Petitioners are highly prejudiced. Hence, finding no other alternative, they have filed this writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

¶18

Mr. Mohapatra, learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that he has no instruction in this matter and if the aforesaid O.L.R. Misc Case is still pending before Sub-Collector, Sadar, Cuttack, he may be directed to take a decision on the same in accordance with law.

¶19

Page 1 of 1

¶20

// 2 //

¶21

Taking into consideration the innocuous nature of the prayer made by the Petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case of the Petitioners disposes of this writ petition with a direction that on production of certified copy of this order within a period of two weeks hence, the SubCollector, Sadar, Cuttack-Opposite Party No.3 shall do well to take a decision in OLR Misc Case No. 18 of 2020 giving opportunity of hearing to the parities concerned, if the same is still pending and there is no legal impediment.

¶22

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper

¶23

bks/sb

¶24

application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Vacation Judge

¶25

Page 2 of 2

Malati Sethi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malati Sethi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Simanchal Sarab Vs State of Odisha

Manmatha Das Vs R.T.O., Chandikhole

Sanjay Das Vs a.R.T.O., Barbil

Suryamani Tripathy Vs State of Odisha

Kusumalata Jena Vs State of Odisha

Sabita Dash Vs R.T.O., Bbsr I