The Chief Justice and Justice R.K. Pattanaik dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on 08.02.2022 because the matter had been rendered so by the Senior Counsel for the Petitioner and no further arguments were recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.14368 of 2015
Sadananda Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. G. Pujari, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha & others Opposite Parties Mr. S.N. Das, ASC
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
08.02.2022
Order No.
03. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the matter has been
rendered infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
T.TUDU
Sadananda Sahoo
State of Odisha & others
Chief Justice
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
