Writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the learned counsel for the petitioner stated they had no instructions. No legal principles were articulated in this procedural order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 14168 of 2009
M/s. Dev Carrier and Minerals (P) Ltd. …. Petitioner None
-versus-
Director, Mines and Others … Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Muduli, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No. 04.07.2022
03. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no
instructions.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
M/s. Dev Carrier and Minerals (P) Ltd.
Director, Mines and Others
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
