Sk.Tafique Ahemad v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition sanctioned under Article 226 was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the court. No substantive issues were adjudicated.
Writ petition sanctioned under Article 226 was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the court. No substantive issues were adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.13834 of 2013
Sk. Tafique Ahemad …. Petitioner None -versus…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER
10.02.2022
1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
KC Bisoi
Sk. Tafique Ahemad
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court