Ananga Kumar Otta v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a better petition to focus on precise issues, as sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a better petition to focus on precise issues, as sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.13673 of 2018
Ananga Kumar Otta
…. Petitioner
Mr. A. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, A.S.G. for Union of India Mr. Debasish Nayak, A.G.A. for the State
Union of India and others
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
11.08.2022
Order No.
S.K. Guin
Ananga Kumar Otta
Union of India
Justice R.K. Pattanaik
Justice S.K. Guin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court