Petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition became infructuous due to efflux of time. The Court disposed of the petition as infructuous while preserving the petitioner's right to approach the appropriate forum if any cause of action survives.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; liberty to approach appropriate forum if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 13361 of 2008
Durga Prasad Mishra
….. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Nayak, Adv.
Vs.
State of Orissa
….. Opposite Party State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
25.02.2022
Order No.
Ashok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(V. NARASINGH)
JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Durga Prasad Mishra
State of Orissa
DR. B.R. SARANGI
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
