Coram (R. K. Pattanaik, J.; M. Panda, J.) impleaded new opposite parties to W.P.(C) No.1222 of 2022. Directed Collector Sambalpur to examine a representation with hearing within specified timelines before disposing the writ petition.
Impleadment of opposite parties; direction to pass reasoned order after hearing within timelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.1222 of 2022
Panchanan Seth
…. Petitioner
M/s. M. K. Rath and associate, Advocates -versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. I. Mahanty, ASC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Order No.
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK ORDER 15.07.2022
I. A. 9083 of 2002
W.P.(C) No.1222 of 2022
Page 1 of 2
order be made available to them not later than 26th September, 2022. The Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view in the matter.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
M. Panda
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Panchanan Seth
State of Odisha
R. K. Pattanaik
M. Panda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
