Petitioners challenged a hostel outsourcing policy. Counsel admitted failure to approach the appropriate authority for redressal. The Court dismissed the petition without issuing notice to all parties and directed petitioners to approach the appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 11249 of 2022
Ranjit Kumar Dash and others Petitioners
Mr. Sachidananda Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another Opposite Parties
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Tripathy, ASC for State-OP No.1
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
17.5.2022
1 1.
(i) Why the Opp. Party No.1 shall not be directed to amend or modify its letter No.HE-UE-Policy-0013-2021, 37688/HE, Dated 18.9.2021, vide Annexure-1, thereby incorporating some provision to protect the existing employees/staff of University Hotels, within a time frame;
and
(ii) Why the Opp. Party No.2 shall not be directed not to handover the operation of the Hostels to out-sourcing agency till, the amendment or modification of Annexure-1 is undertaken by the Opp. Party No.1.
// 2 //
grievance and the writ petition may be permitted to withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(M.S.Sahoo)
Judge
dutta
Page 2 of 2
Ranjit Kumar Dash and others
State of Odisha
Opposite Party No.2
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
