In this writ appeal, the appellant appeared without representation. The High Court dismissed the appeal solely on the ground of non-prosecution, thereby quashing the proceedings without any substantive analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 453 of 2018
Brahmananda Mallik
…. Appellant None
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and Others Respondents
Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
Order No. 27.10.2022
03. 1. None appears for the Appellant.
2. The writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal is to be allowed or dismissed for non-prosecution.
Brahmananda Mallik
State of Odisha and Others
M.S. RAMAN
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
