The single-judge bench dismissed Writ Appeal No. 120 of 2016 for non-prosecution as the appellant's counsel appeared without instructions.
Writ Appeal No. 120 of 2016 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 120 of 2016
Anil Kumar Mohanty
…. Appellant
M/s. K.K. Swain, Advocate & Associates -versus-
…. Pramod Kumar Mohanty and others Respondents Mr. L. Samantaray, Additional Government Advocate for State M/s. S.B. Panda, Advocate & Associates
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
14.12.2022
Order No.
05. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant states that he has no
instructions in the matter.
2. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
S. Behera
Anil Kumar Mohanty
Pramod Kumar Mohanty and others
Dr. S. Muralidhar
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
