The Single Judge allowed an affidavit application, condoning an 18-day delay. A second writ appeal challenging the order was dismissed, as there was no stay and the respondent had superannuated; legal questions were left open.
Delay condoned and application allowed in Misc. Case No. 177 of 2018; Writ appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A. No. 111 of 2018
…. Chairman, Odisha Gramya Bank and Appellants Others
Mr. K.C. Kanungo, Advocate
-versus-
…. Pradeep Kumar Mohapatra Respondent
None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
26.10.2022
Misc. Case No.177 of 2018
W.A. No.111 of 2018
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned?
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Single Judge's order regarding the respondent who has attained superannuation age?
Chairman, Odisha Gramya Bank
Pradeep Kumar Mohapatra
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
