The Court dismissed the petitioner's request to transfer her MAT case from Anandapur to Balasore due to lack of substantiated material and proximity of locations. However, the Court directed the lower court to arrange travel expenses if claimed.
Transfer prayed for is dismissed. However, direction issued to grant travel expenses if claimed by the wife.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
TRP(C) No.378 of 2021
Sitamani Barik. …. Petitioner
-versus-
…. Bijaya Kumar Barik. Opposite Party CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI ORDER 12.04.2022 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to transfer the MAT (Matrimonial Application) case from Civil Judge, Anandapur to Family Court, Balasore
Whether to grant travel expenses to the petitioner-wife if travel becomes necessary
Sitamani Barik
Bijaya Kumar Barik
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
