The High Court of Orissa dismissed an interlocutory application seeking modification of a transfer order. The Court held that the requested change required reviewing the principle, not correcting errors, and was not entertained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
TRP(C) No.376 of 2021
Barshana Mustaffa
Petitioner
-versus-
Mohammed Raja
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
07.02.2022
I.A. No.26 of 2022
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain an application to modify a transfer order by reviewing the substantive decision rather than correcting clerical or arithmetical errors.
Barshana Mustaffa
Mohammed Raja
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
