Jyotirmayee Dash @ Panda Vs Dibakar Panda

Civil Proceeding No.439 of 2016 instituted at the instance of the Opposite Party-husband from the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack to the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Athagarh.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the Opposite Party though notice has been made sufficient.

¶16

The Petitioner has sought for transfer the aforesaid Civil Proceeding on the ground that criminal cases instituted at her instance are pending in the Court at Athagarh.

¶17

The distance that can be covered hardly within one hour. Ordinarily the Court having jurisdiction should try a case, but transfer

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

// 2 //

¶20

of the same can be made in exceptional circumstances under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, if sufficient cause is shown.

¶21

Here in this case, the ground sought for being not convincing, the Court is not inclined to transfer the Civil Proceeding No.439 of 2016 to the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Athagarh.

¶22

Accordingly, the TRP(C) stands dismissed.

¶23

DA

¶24

However, learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack is directed to
dispose of the Civil Proceeding No.439 of 2016 as expeditiously as
possible, if there is no other legal impediment.
(S. Pujahari)
Judge

¶25

Page 2 of 2

Jyotirmayee Dash @ Panda v. Dibakar Panda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyotirmayee Dash @ Panda v. Dibakar Panda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Itishree Jena Vs Lalatendu Mohapatra

Nirjharika@Nibedita Mandhata Vs Rajib Kumar Balabantaray

Lalatendu Mohapatra Vs Itishree Jena

Suryakanta Bhola Vs State of Odisha

Geetarani Pradhan Vs Suvendu Mohan Pradhan

Jyoti Kumari Ratha Vs Tushar Kanta Ratha