Dismissed
State v. M/S.Aurobinda Store
Orissa HCSTREV/67/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision petition by Sales Tax Commissioner dismissed as tax amount was insubstantial; Court chose not to interfere and left legal question open for future decision; no substantive relief granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
STREVNo.67 of 2008
¶3
State of Orissa represented by …. Petitioner Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
¶4
Mr. S. S. Padhy, ASC
¶5
-versus-
¶6
M/s. Aurobinda Store, Cuttack …. Opposite Party None
¶7
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
¶8
ORDER 06.04.2022
¶9
Order No.
¶10
- The tax amount being insubstantial, the Court is not persuaded to interfere in the matter. Leaving the question of law left open for decision in some other appropriate case, the revision petition is dismissed.
¶11
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
State of Orissa represented by Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
- respondent
M/s. Aurobinda Store, Cuttack
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court