State of Orissa v. M/S.Manilal and Bros.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK STREV No.44…
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed due to non-filing of requisites for notice issuance for fourteen years.
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK STREV No.44…
Revision petition dismissed due to non-filing of requisites for notice issuance for fourteen years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV No.44 of 2008
State of Orissa represented by the …. Petitioner Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
Mr. S.S. Padhy, Additional Standing Counsel -versus…. M/s Manilal & Brothers, Keonjhar Opposite Party
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
11.05.2022
Order No.
05. 1. Requisites for issuance of notice to the Opposite Party have not
been filed since last fourteen years.
2. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Guin
State of Orissa
Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa, Cuttack
M/s Manilal & Brothers
Justice R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court