The revision petition by M/s ORTEL Communications Limited was dismissed because the counsel stated the matter had become infructuous. The order contains no substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV No.20 of 2009
M/s ORTEL Communications Limited
…. Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
…. Assessing Authority, Bhubaneswar-II Opposite Parties Circle and others
Mr. S.S. Padhy, A.S.C.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
27.06.2022
Order No.
04. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the
present petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. The revision petition is dismissed as such.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Guin
M/s ORTEL Communications Limited
Assessing Authority, Bhubaneswar-II Opposite Parties Circle
R.K. PATTANAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
