The State tax revision petition was dismissed by this Court. While noting diverse reasons including lack of enquiry prior to assuming suppression of sales and unexplained delay, the order ultimately dismisses the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV No.115 of 2019
State of Odisha …. Petitioner Mr. Susanta Kumar Pradhan, ASC
-versus-
M/s. Ankita Agencies
…. Opposite Party None
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN
ORDER
20.12.2022
Order No.
02. I.A. No.230 of 2019
1. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed.
2. Filing of original/certified copies of the order under Annexures-1
& 2 are dispensed.
3. The I.A. is disposed of.
STREV No.115 of 2019
Page 1 of 2
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M. S. Raman)
Judge
MRS/Laxmikant
Page 2 of 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gupta Distributor v. State of OdishaReferred¶4
Gupta Distributor v. State of Odisha
State of Odisha
M/s. Ankita Agencies
M. S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
