Durapati v. Jagat
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses an appeal filed in 1986 for non-prosecution as neither party appeared despite multiple listings. No legal principle or substantive rule is laid down as the matter was disposed of on procedural grounds without argument.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.A. No.289 of 1986
…. Durapati Mahanto & Others Appellants Mr.D.P. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
…. Jagat Mohan Mahanto Respondent Mr.S. Mohapatra, Advocate CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 06.07.2022 Order No. 07. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual/physical mode). 2. None appears for the Appellants as also the Respondent in this Appeal of the year 1986 when it is called. This was also the situation on earlier two occasions when opportunity being provided to the Appellants, it has been directed for its listing to today.
- In the above state of affair; the Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(D. Dash) Judge
Himansu
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Durapati Mahanto & Others
- respondent
Jagat Mohan Mahanto
Coram
D. Dash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court