Dismissed
Chudamany v. Chaturbhuja
Orissa HCSA/156/1999
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear despite multiple opportunities for relisting.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK SA NO.156 OF 1999
¶2
…. Chudamany Pandey & Others Appellants Mr. T. Mishra, Advocate
¶3
-versus-
¶4
…. Chaturbhuja Sahu & Others Respondents Mr. S.K. Purahit, Advocate
¶5
CORAM:
¶6
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
¶7
ORDER
¶8
12.07.2022
¶9
Order No.
¶11
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (virtual/physical mode).
¶12
- None appears for the Appellants when the matter of the year 1997 is called. This was also the situation on earlier occasions when the Court had provided opportunities to the learned Counsel for the Appellants by directing for relisting of the matter. Inspite of that, the situation has not improved.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Chudamany Pandey & Others
- respondent
Chaturbhuja Sahu & Others
Coram
AI extract
D. Dash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court