Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Madhab Kalia Vs State and Anr. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
Madhab Kalia Vs State and Anr.Madhab Kalia v. State and Anr.

Dismissed

Madhab Kalia v. State and Anr.

Orissa HC30 Jun 2022RPFAM/96/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge dismissed the RPFAM for nonprosecution on the ground that the petitioner did not appear in court despite a call for adjourned hearing.

What did the court decide?

RPFAM No.96 of 2011 was dismissed for non-prosecution.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

RPFAM No.96 OF 2011

Madhab Kalia Petitioner

None

-versus-

State of Odisha and another

…. Opp. Parties

Mr. Dillip Kumar Mishra, Additional Government Advocate

CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

30.06.2022

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Madhab Kalia
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

K.R. Mohapatra

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 30 Jun 2022 · June
Registered: 5 Sept 2011
Case no.: RPFAM/96/2011

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.r.mohapatra

Prafulla Panigrahi Vs State of Odisha
29 Jun 2022
Barada Prasanna Mohanty Vs State of Odisha
29 Jun 2022
Sourav Swain Vs R.T.O, Cuttack
29 Jun 2022
Karanikar Naik Vs R.T.O. Chandikhole
30 Jun 2022

Cite this judgement

Madhab Kalia v. State and Anr., RPFAM/96/2011 (OD), decided on 30 June 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K.R. Mohapatra

Parties & counsel

Outcome

RPFAM No.96 of 2011 was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Where a petitioner fails to appear at a call for an adjourned hearing, the High Court is justified in dismissing the appeal pursuant to Order XIX Rule 3(1) CPC for lack of prosecution.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

The Petitioner in this RPFAM seeks to assail the order dated 2^nd August, 2011 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack in Criminal Petition No.308 of 2010.

On perusal of the order sheet, it appears that after the interim order dated 24^th April, 2012 was passed in Misc. Case No.54 of 2012, the matter was adjourned on different dates. Today, none appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.

In view of the above, this Court feels that the Petitioner

has lost interest in pursuing the matter.

Accordingly, this RPFAM stands dismissed for nonprosecution.

(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge

ms

Page 1 of 1

CNR

ODHC010376262011

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

Disposed Off

Biswaranjan Swain Vs R.T.O., Ctc

30 Jun 2022

Arun K.Dash Vs Monalisa Mishra

30 Jun 2022