Court directed High Court registry to re-register the registered appeal as MATA in light of the dispute nature.
Register the RPFAM as MATA and list it before the assigned Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM NO. 247 OF 2022 Bharati Behera @ Pradhan and …. Petitioners another
Ms. S. Das, Advocate
-Versus-
Prasant Kumar Pradhan …. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No. 21.10.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. In view of the nature of dispute in this RPFAM, it should
have been registered as MATA as pointed out by the S.R.
3. Registry is directed to register the RPFAM to MATA and
list it before the assigned Bench.
bks (K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
bks
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharati Behera @ Pradhan
Prasant Kumar Pradhan
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
