The revision petition in a maintenance matter was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before this High Court, despite the opposite party being present.
RPFAM dismissed for non-prosecution; interim stay order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.222 of 2018
Debasis Mohapatra
..… Petitioner
None
-versus-
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Amit Prasad Bose, Advocate
Sanjukta Mohapatra and another
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
11.07.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
present. Again on 12th August, 2021, the matter stood adjourned.
Issue urgent certified copy of the order on proper
application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the RPFAM should be allowed or dismissed given the lack of appearance by the petitioner.
Debasis Mohapatra
Sanjukta Mohapatra and another
K.R. Mohapatra
S.S. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
