Application for condonation of delay in filing recall petition withdrawn. Court observed Family Court to consider writ pendency period while adjudicating condonation.
RPFAM disposed of as withdrawn; Family Court directed to consider writ pendency while deciding condonation application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 140 OF 2022
Radhamohan @ Aswini Behera @ …. Petitioner Aswani Behera @ Aswin Kumar Behera
Mr. Hemanta Kumar Ratsingh, Advocate
-versus-
…. Jayanti Kumari Parida and another Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER 16.08.2022
Order No.
I.A. No.196 of 2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
ms
adjudicating the petition for condonation of delay, if any, in considering the petition under proviso to Section 126 (2) of the Cr.P.C., learned Judge, Family Court, Keonjhar should take into consideration the period of pendency of the writ petition before this Court from 8th July, 2022 till the next date along with other grounds.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Radhamohan @ Aswini Behera
Jayanti Kumari Parida
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
