Petitioner appealed against an interim maintenance order passed by the Family Court, which awarded Rs.400/- monthly per petitioner and a marriage gift. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding the awarded maintenance just and reasonable given the respondent's low pension and lack of other income sources.
The RPFAM is dismissed as it is devoid of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM NO. 125 OF 2020
Sakuntala Parida
…. Petitioner
Mr. Susanta Kumar Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
Ganeswar Parida
…. Opp. Party Mr. Bikram Keshari Raj, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
09.09.2022
to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.1700/- per month. He further submits that the maintenance awarded is meager and is not sufficient for maintenance of the Petitioners. Hence, he submits
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
that the maintenance awarded by learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack requires reconsideration.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
bks
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the RPFAM regarding maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. warrants interference or dismissal.
Sakuntala Parida
Ganeswar Parida
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
