The High Court, Orissa determined the nomenclature of a Recurring Petition/Family Matter to be Writ Petition (Civil) as the petitioner challenged a Family Court order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Registry verified and registered the RPFAM as W.P.(C).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM NO. 102 OF 2021
Dibya Prasanna Tripathy
..... Petitioner
Mr. Partha Sarathi Nayak, Advocate -versus-
…. Pritam Utkalika Dhupal Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
15.07.2022
I.A. No. 198 of 2022
RPFAM NO. 102 OF 2021
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
bks
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application should be registered in the Writ Jurisdiction as a WP(C) given the challenge to a Family Court order?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dibya Prasanna Tripathy
Pritam Utkalika Dhupal Opp. Party
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
