The High Court dismissed the miscellaneous case and the appeal solely on the ground of inordinate delay without condoning the explanation provided.
The Misc. Case and the appeal were dismissed on the ground of limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.942 of 2019
National Insurance Company Ltd., through its Manager, Legal Cell, Cantonment Road, Cuttack
…. Appellant Mr. R.K. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
Bimala Sahu and Others
…. Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, counsel for Respondents 1 - 4
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
15.12.2022
Order No.
I.A. No.1694 of 2019 & MACA No.942 of 2019
( B.P. Routray) Judge
M.K.Panda
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 360 days in filing the appeal can be condoned?
National Insurance Company Ltd.
Bimala Sahu and Others
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
