High Court accepted counsel submission of additional sum for appellant-claimants on motor accident death compensation and directed Insurance Company to deposit Rs 3.5 lakhs before Tribunal.
Insurance Company directed to deposit further consolidated sum of Rs.3,50,000/- before Tribunal for disbursement to claimants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.895 of 2019
Pratima Moharana and others …. Appellants Mr. B. Singh, Advocate
-versus-
Dhaneswar Sahoo and another …. Respondents Mr. G.P. Dutta, Advocate for Respondent No.2
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 29.08.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
has not added any future prospects to the income and also did not grant any parental consortium to the minor child of the deceased.
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
B.K. Barik
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether additional compensation for future prospects and parental consortium should be granted for minor child.
Whether the High Court should enhance the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
Pratima Moharana and others
Dhaneswar Sahoo
B. P. ROUTRAY
B.K. Barik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
