Dismissed
Narayan Nath v. Giridhari Sahoo
Orissa HCMACA/759/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the appeal for non-filing of requisites despite a peremptory order dated 11th July, 2022.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-filing of requisites.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
MACA No.759 of 2003
¶3
Narayan Nath
¶4
Appellant
¶5
Mr.S.K.Mohanty, Advocate
¶6
-versus-
¶7
Giridhari Sahoo and another …. Respondents Mr.P.K.Panda, Advocate
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
¶10
Order No.
¶12
ORDER
05.8.2022
1. The matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. Despite peremptory order dated 11 th July, 2022, requisites
have not been filed. As such, the appeal is dismissed.
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Narayan Nath
- respondent
Giridhari Sahoo
Coram
AI extract
B. P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court