Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution when the appellant did not appear. Notice requisites were not filed by the appellant.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.315 of 2006
Achutananda Sahoo …. Appellant
None
-versus-
…
Binod Bihari Prusty and another Respondents
None
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No. 28.10.2022
04. 1. It appears that postal requisites for issuance of notice have not
yet been filed. Further, the receipt showing service of copy of the
appeal memo on Mr. P. K. Panda, Advocate, has also not been
filed.
2. None appears for the Appellant.
3. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
M. Panda
Achutananda Sahoo
Binod Bihari Prusty
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
