Appeal against MACT award of Rs.30,000 compensation for minor's injury. High Court increased compensation by Rs.20,000 considering treatment at Government hospitals, directing insurer to deposit sum with Tribunal.
Furter consolidated sum of Rs.20,000 granted to be deposited by insurer with Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MACA No.228 of 2021
Chandrabhanu Padhan
…. Appellant Mr. S. B. Das, Advocate
-versus-
Sitaram Panda and another
…. Respondents
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Advocate for Respondent No.2
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 29.11.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
granted by the learned Tribunal. He thus prays for enhancing the same.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
B.K. Barik
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quantification of compensation granted by the Tribunal required enhancement given the higher medical expenses incurred.
Chandrabhanu Padhan
Sitaram Panda
Insurance Company
B. P. ROUTRAY
B.K. BARIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
