Panchami Majhi v. Bhaskar Nages@Sethi
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was admitted. Counsel for the appellant filed no instructions and no prosecution. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution on 09.01.2022.
The appeal was admitted. Counsel for the appellant filed no instructions and no prosecution. The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution on 09.01.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.198 of 2019
Panchami Majhi
…. Appellant
Mr. B. Das, Advocate
-versus-
Bhaskar Nages @ Sethi and Others
…. Respondents
Ms. J. Rath, counsel for Respondent No.1 Mr. Dayanidhi Mishra, counsel for Respondent No.4
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
2.12.2022
Order No.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
M.K.Panda
Panchami Majhi
Bhaskar Nages @ Sethi and Others
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court