Justice S.K. Sahoo disposed of an unopposed revision petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh anticipatory bail application, noting the petitioner's absence in person.
Liberty to the petitioner to file an anticipatory bail application before this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLREV No.46 of 2022
Alok Kumar Rout
Petitioner
Mr. P.C. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
1. State of Odisha
2. Anil Kumar Parida
…. Opp. Parties
Mrs. Susamarani Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel
Order No.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 16.08.2022
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement
(video conferencing/physical mode).
None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 18.01.2022 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Keonjhar in rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.
Since the petitioner has to approach this Court in anticipatory bail application, this revision petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
RKM
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should be disposed of to grant liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application.
Whether the order rejecting the anticipatory bail application below requires final adjudication in a revision.
Alok Kumar Rout
State of Odisha
Anil Kumar Parida
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
