Utsa Pattnaik@Jena v. Arjab Jena
Case brief
What is this about?
This order states that Criminal Revision No.130 of 2022 is disposed of as infructuous, with no substantive legal reasoning provided.
What did the court decide?
Disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLREV No.130 of 2022
…. Utsa Pattnaik @ Jena
Petitioner
Mr. P.K.Ghose, Advocate
-versus-
….
Arjab Jena and another Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
01.12.2022.
Order No.
02. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter
has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the CRLREV is disposed of as infructuous.
(Sashikanta Mishra) AKB Judge
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Utsa Pattnaik @ Jena
- respondent
Arjab Jena and another
Coram
Sashikanta Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court