The High Court of Orissa dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Case for non-prosecution as the petitioners repeatedly failed to appear or send counsel on the date of hearing, echoing an earlier order dated 27.10.2017.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.998 of 2005 was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.998 of 2005
Nrusingha Moharana & others
…. Petitioners
-versus-
Nirmal Moharana
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: THE JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order 22.02.2022
No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. It appears that on 27.10.2017, none appeared for the
Petitioners and as such the following order was passed.
“None appears on behalf of the petitioners in
spite of repeated call. The Registry is directed to
send back the LCR forthwith in order to enable
learned trial court to take steps for early disposal of
the matter.”
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
PKS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Case for converting proceedings under Section 144(2) Cr.P.C. to Section 145 Cr.P.C. can be adjudicated in the absence of the petitioners?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Nrusingha Moharana & others
Nirmal Moharana
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
