The Court held that the criminal miscellaneous application was rendered infructuous and accordingly dismissed the same. No substantive legal issue was decided.
CRLMC dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.692 of 2016
Babula Meher
…. Petitioner
Mr. B.S. Dasparida, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party Mr. J. Katikia, A.G.A. for the State
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER Order No. 23.09.2022 04. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the present application has been rendered infructuous.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
S.K. Guin/M. Panda
Babula Meher
State of Orissa
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
