Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings under Section 420 IPC, alleging a civil dispute resulting from a misused hand loan. The Court held that uncontroverted allegations prima facie disclosed an offence. Application dismissed on contest without costs.
CRLMC dismissed on contest without any costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.625 of 2017
Sndip Kumar Kanhar @ Sandeep Kumar Kanhar
Petitioner
Mr. D.R. Swain, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr. S.R. Roul, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
13.12.2022
// 2 //
criminal proceeding against the petitioner may be quashed.
( G. Satapathy) Judge
Subhasmita
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceeding under Section 420 IPC should be quashed based on the allegation of cheating done through a false pretext.
Whether the dispute is purely civil in nature or involves a prima facie offence warranting criminal prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sndip Kumar Kanhar @ Sandeep Kumar Kanhar
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
